Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joan Hussey's avatar

Good point Satenik, she refuses to educate the public about real affordable housing options.

The points discussed all sound like simple charity for the poor, and not good public policy for everyone who's not a millionaire. We need policy even for the structures in Bloomfield that need to be preserved and not just let to run down to get knocked down.

Landlords with old amortized buildings need to keep them repaired and continue to offer affordable apartments.

And then the back up band gets "excited," or should we call it "campaigning?" Thank for describing that too:

Then Councilwoman Cruz chimed in about being “so excited” about affordable housing. She claimed she had long pushed for this rehabilitation program, congratulated the council for “getting to this point,” and said she was “really happy” Bloomfield would finally offer what other towns already had. She praised the timeline, repeated that the township “wants to help residents stay in place,” and even framed basic repairs like roofs or driveways as a victory—despite years of inaction. This rang hollow given her track record of skipping Rent Leveling Board meetings and failing to report anything about that board’s work. If she doesn’t even recognize that rent-controlled apartments are part of Bloomfield’s affordable housing stock, then her “excitement” is meaningless.

Oh, and that Glenwood Avenue bus shelter is finally on the list of things to do. Excellent. When it's completed we can call it "improved local transit," on the campaign card.

Expand full comment
Karen Banda's avatar

I wasn't happy, as usual, with our mayor's responses and lack thereof during the public comments section of the meeting. Speakers were either left with dead silence at the end of their comments or given a curt response that residents can speak but the council won't provide answers. Then what's the purpose of the exercise? Just a venting session? Awful. That was never the case with past administrations.

However, I found it interesting that she did, actually, pick and choose who she did deign to respond to, sometimes very rudely, as with Ted Glick. Nine years residents have been bringing up solar energy at council meetings and they've always been given excuses - sorry, I mean explanations - as to why it hasn't moved forward. As Ted mentioned at the end of his time, things aren't going to get any less expensive and there were programs the town in missing out on. Also, I found her comment that the company Ted recommended, according to Mundell, is a vendor and they're going to try to sell us on their product. Really! What a concept! None of the vendors she's given contracts to did? Or were there other reasons they were chosen? Things that

make you wonder. (Not really.)

As for the issue with ICE in Bloomfield, with the many Latinas on the council I find it very odd that the council isn't more pro-active in putting policies and programs in place. It's being left to concerned residents to fight the illegal roundup of immigrants. Why? And what about the families left behind? And what will happen if ICE shows up at a school? Nothing?

Last but not least, is there a new rule now that council members can't ask questions about any of the proposed projects? Or is everything just so peachy perfect for our town (ha) that there's nothing to question?

We need members of the council who will speak up and ask the hard questions! No more rubber stamps. This mayor and council are out of control. Does any of this remind you of a certain president?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts